Legal Opinion

O'Farrell v. Tipton

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 10, 2012No. A132327PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REARDON, Acting P. J.

—Nondebtor spouse Marcia Tipton appeals from a postjudgment order granting respondent Litke O’Farrell, LLC (Litke), a charging order against what she asserts has become her separate property interest in certain partnerships and limited liability companies that were divided pursuant to a marital settlement agreement (MSA). The charging order was designed to satisfy a judgment entered against her husband, Richard Tipton. The trial court concluded that under Family Code1 section 916, subdivision (a) (section 916(a)), her interest in such property did not become…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mejia v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Adams v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. In Re Marriage of HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Lezine v. Security Pacific Financial Services Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Sanborn v. SanbornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. MorariCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  2. Marriage of Bader CA3California Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API