Legal Opinion

Lezine v. Security Pacific Financial Services Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1996No. S049019PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.

During his marriage to plaintiff Gloria J. Lezine (plaintiff), Henry Lezine (Lezine) unilaterally transferred a security interest in community real property (the Halm Avenue property) to defendant Security Pacific Financial Services, Inc. (Security Pacific), without the knowledge or consent of plaintiff, in violation of former section 5127 of the Civil Code (hereafter former section 5127). By the present action, plaintiff sought to have the transfer of the security interest set aside in its entirety pursuant to the authority of former section 5127 and Droeger v. Friedman,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Droeger v. Friedman, Sloan & RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Britton v. HammellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Kinney v. VallentyneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Robertson v. WillisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Mitchell v. American Reserve InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Mejia v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Century Surety Co. v. PolissoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Wolkowitz v. Beverly (In Re Beverly)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Walrath v. WalrathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. First Community Bank v. Maureen GaughanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API