Legal Opinion

Lamm v. Crumpler

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 7, 1951No. 746PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNboene, J.

The point raised by the demurrer ore tenus entered here for the first time, and debated orally, being well founded, takes precedence over, and renders it unnecessary to consider those questions of law arising upon the demurrer filed and heard in the trial court, and debated in the written briefs of the parties on this appeal. Hence we have abbreviate statement of facts pertaining to those questions of law.

A .defendant in a civil action in this State may demur ore tenus at any time in either the trial court, or in the Supreme Court, upon the ground that the complaint does not state a cause of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. King v. . WinantsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  2. Owens v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Davis v. Keen.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Covington v. . ThreadgillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  5. Snipes v. . MondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Aiken v. SanderfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Martin v. UnderhillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Lamm v. CrumplerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Stamey v. Rutherpordton Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Lexington Insulation Company v. Davidson CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API