Alexander v. . Alexander
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil actioN, tried before Bryan, J., at August, 1896, Term of the Superior Court of BuNoombe county, on a referee’s report and exceptions thereto. There was judgment for the plaintiffs and defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
CuaRK, J.:
The order of Armfield, J., passing upon the report of Ihe referee, but recommitting it for correction, was not appealable, and an exception should have been noted so as to bring up the ruling on appeal from the final judgment. Wallace v. Douglas. 105 N. C., 42, and other cases cited; Clark’s Code, Second Ed., p. 562. The appeal then noted, but abandoned because premature, is a sufficient exception. Luttrell v. Martin, 112 N. C., 593. The settlement of the guardian, P. A. Cummings, with the administrator, and the receipt giren in full by him, is binding upon such guardian, who, from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- May v. Stimson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Culp v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- S. B. Luttrell & Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Scroggs v. . StevensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Wallace Bros. v. DouglasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Sigman v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Dockery v. Fairbanks-Morse Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Snipes v. . MondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- City of Goldsboro v. W. P. Rose Builders Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.