Legal Opinion
Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 28, 1984No. 83-7700PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal from a decision of the Federal Trade Commission, Sterling Drug, Inc. seeks review of a determination that it disseminated false advertising for its nonprescription analgesic products. Sterling contests findings by the Commission that its advertising was deceptive. It contends that the provisions of the cease and desist order are not warranted by the record and that the order applies to more of Sterling’s products than is warranted by the record, We uphold the findings and enforce the order.
I
Facts and Procedural History
Sterling Drug, Inc. (“Sterling”)…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Cement InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Jacob Siegel Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Corn Products Refining Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. World Travel Vacation Brokers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Hospital Corporation of America v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Cook, Perkiss And Liehe, Inc. v. Northern California Collection Service Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- National Council Against Health Fraud, Inc. v. King Bio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.