Legal Opinion
American Home Products Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 4, 1983No. 81-2920PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
Before us is a petition for review of an Order entered by the Federal Trade Commission (“Commission”) against American Home Products (“AHP”). The Order requires that AHP cease and desist various deceptive advertisements for a number of its drug products, including Anacin and Arthritis Pain Formula (APF). AHP does not take issue with all of the findings of deceptiveness on which the Order is based. It argues nonetheless that some of these findings are not supported by substantial evidence, and that, whether or not the findings are adequately supported,…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- National Society of Professional Engineers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Southland Sod Farms v. Stover Seed Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Richardson-Vicks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Southland Sod Farms v. Stover Seed Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Aspinall v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Consumer Protection Division Office of the Attorney General v. Consumer Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.