Legal Opinion

United States v. Lord

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 11, 1962No. 15,643PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

The accused contends the charges against him were improperly withdrawn from one court-martial and referred to another for the purpose of having a more severe sentence imposed upon him in event of conviction.1

As a result of his conduct on the early morning hours of January 2,1961, a number of charges were filed against the accused, including two specifications of extortion and two specifications of unlawfully confining Captain and Mrs. Christopher Kirk, in violation of Articles 97 and 127, respectively, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §| 897,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  2. United States v. GreenwaltUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  3. United States v. EmersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1951
  4. United States v. AcfalleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  5. United States v. PicotteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. HardyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  2. Petty v. Convening AuthorityUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  3. United States v. JacksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  4. Vanover v. ClarkUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  5. United States v. KokeU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API