Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Gibbs

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 1966No. 366PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The contract provides for the payment of “sure-rent” by the defendant,- — -that is, certain and unconditional payment. It provides only one event that might relieve him: the reduction of the tobacco acreage. The defendant admits that this did not occur, but contends that putting acreage-poundage control into effect has the same result and that he should be absolved. However, in his Answer the defendant says that it was not anticipated by the parties and in his brief says “it was totally unanticipated by the parties at the time the contract was made.” In substance he asks that the plaintiff be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weyerhaeuser Company v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Williamson v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Green v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Bailey v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Archer and White Sales, Inc. v. Henry Schein, IncoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  2. Wachovia Mortgage Co. v. Autry-Barker-Spurrier Real Estate, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Dixon, Odom & Co. v. SledgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Isbey v. CrewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Lovin v. CrispCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API