Williamson v. Miller
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
The gravamen of plaintiff’s action, as stated in the complaint, is found to be as follows: (1) That the defendants violated their agreement to purchase oil and other mentioned products from the plaintiff, thereby causing the latter loss in profits, and because of their investment in the construction of a bulk plant and the purchase of trucks to supply defendants with products; and (2) that the defendants have broken their agreement to display on the premises plaintiff’s trade marks and advertising matter, causing further damage and loss. Total damages are claimed in the sum of $25,000, which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Croom v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Croom v. Goldsboro Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Elks v. . Insurance CoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Belk's Department Store v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Van Slyke v. Broadway InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Davidson & Jones, Inc. v. County of New HanoverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Weyerhaeuser Company v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Croom v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Yeager v. DobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Sprinkle v. PonderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.