Legal Opinion

Lovin v. Crisp

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1978No. 7730DC324PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Judge.

The plaintiffs, by their single assignment of error, contend that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for the defendants. This assignment is meritorious.

The plaintiffs contend that summary judgment for the defendants was erroneous, and that a proper construction of the deed of 20 June 1963 reveals that, as a matter of law, it created an easement appurtenant to the lands conveyed by its terms and no other lands. The plaintiffs additionally contend that their complaint and affidavits raised substantial issues of material fact as to trespasses by the defendants,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Weyerhaeuser Company v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Oliver v. ErnulSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Hine v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Bailey v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Taylor v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Newcomb v. County of CarteretCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. Southern Furniture Co. of Conover, Inc. v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Z.A. Sneeden's Sons, Inc. v. ZP No. 116, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Butler Drive Property Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Cochran v. KellerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API