Legal Opinion
Kidwell v. Sybaritic, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 24, 2010No. A07-584, A07-788PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
‘ OPINION
GILDEA, Justice.
Appellant Brian Eidwell appeals from a Minnesota Court of Appeals’ decision overturning a jury verdict in his favor and granting respondent Sybaritic, Inc., judgment as a matter of law. After Eidwell was terminated from his position as in-house general counsel for Sybaritic, he commenced an action, alleging a violation of the whistleblower statute, Minn.Stat. § 181.932 (2008). Sybaritic counterclaimed, alleging breach of fiduciary duty and conversion. A jury found in favor of Eidwell and awarded him damages in the amount of $197,000, plus fees and costs. The district…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bahr v. Boise Cascade Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Rogers v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- William E. Willis, II v. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Kenneth D. Huffman v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Obst v. Microtron, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Jenna Wood v. SatCom Marketing, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Gieseke v. IDCA, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Harrison v. Granite Bay Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- Winslow v. Aroostook CountyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Swenson v. NickaboineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.