Legal Opinion

Patel v. United States Bureau of Prisons

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 4, 2008No. 06-3819PublishedCited by 248 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.

Inmate Kamal K. Patel brought this lawsuit against the United States Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) and certain prison officials (“Bureau Defendants”) at the Federal Correctional Institution in Forrest City, Arkansas (“FCI-Forrest City”). He sought injunctive relief and monetary damages on the grounds that they violated his right to practice his religion by failing to provide him with appropriate meals in compliance with his religious beliefs. The district court 1 granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on all claims, and Patel appeals. For the reasons discussed…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by248 opinions

  1. Abdulhaseeb v. CalboneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  2. Syed Hassan v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  3. Roman Lee Jones v. Robert E. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  4. Van Wyhe v. ReischCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  5. Moussazadeh v. Texas Department of Criminal JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012

243 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API