Legal Opinion

Rembar Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 20, 1966No. C.D. 2774PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DoNLON, Judge:

The merchandise at bar consists of metal trays (sometimes referred to as boats) and their lids, together with skids which are placed in furnaces as a false bottom on which the trays (or boats) are caused to slide in and out of furnaces. The issue here litigated is whether these are parts of furnaces which have, as an essential feature, an electrical element or device. The claims, in the two consolidated cases, are that the entered articles are such furnace parts, dutiable at 12% per cent ad valorem under paragraph 353, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keer, Maurer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  2. Sullivan v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  3. F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. Ster-Wood Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  5. Gallagher & Ascher Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wico Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. Rembar Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Rembar Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. Rembar Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  5. Rembar Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API