Legal Opinion
Hegwood v. Chinatown CVS, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 17, 2008No. 07-AA-577PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
Rhonda J. Hegwood, the petitioner, challenges the decision of the Office of Administrative Hearings (“OAH”) affirming the determination of a Department of Employment Services (“DOES”) Claims Examiner that she was ineligible for employment benefits because she was discharged for misconduct. For the reasons discussed, we reverse the decision declaring ineligibility and remand the case for further consideration.
Between October 2008 and January 2007, Hegwood was an employee of the CVS Pharmacy in the Chinatown area of Washington, D.C. She initially worked as a cashier, was subsequently promoted…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Filene's Basement Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Washington Times v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Canlas v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Giles v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Chase v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hamilton v. Hojeij Branded Food, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Badawi v. Hawk One Security, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Larry v. National Rehabilitation HospitalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Scott v. Behavioral Research Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Gilmore v. ATLANTIC SERVICES GROUPDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.