Legal Opinion

Schreyer v. Chicago Motocoil Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 6, 1941No. 7433PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPARKS, Circuit Judge.

Appellants charged appellees with infringement of United States patent No. 2,178,512 to Schreyer. The patent was issued October 31, 1939, on an application filed October 3, 1938. Steam-O-Matic Corporation has the exclusive license to niake, use and sell throughout the United States the alleged improvements described in the patent. The individual defendants, Holger Thielgaard, Ted Thielgaard and R. C. Masters, respectively President, Vice-President, and Secretary-Treasurer of the defendant company, were made defendants on the ground that they were using the insolvent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Railroad Supply Co. v. Elyria Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Higby v. A. B. T. Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  4. Monckmeier v. Erie Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Schreyer v. Casco Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  2. Shelco, Inc. v. Dow Chemical CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1970
  3. Kearney & Trecker Corporation v. Giddings & Lewis, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1969
  4. Endevco Corporation v. Chicago Dynamic Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967
  5. Spring-Air Co. v. RagainsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1951

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API