Legal Opinion

Higby v. A. B. T. Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 1, 1937No. 6218PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

From a decree in the District Court finding patent 1,938,495 valid and infringed by defendant, the latter appeals, claiming that there is no sufficient evidence of title in plaintiffs; that the patent is invalid because anticipated and for lack of inventive skill and that defendant does not infringe.

The patent covers a pin ball game apparatus of the type commonly' described as bagatelle, adapted for commercial use. Such apparatus, including a cabinet with a glass top, under which lies a board having a plurality of holes therein -and carrying a number of outstanding…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Ansonia Brass & Copper Co. v. Electrical Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Railroad Supply Co. v. Elyria Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schreyer v. Chicago Motocoil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  2. Benjamin Electric Mfg. Co. v. Bright Light Reflector Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  3. Solar Corporation, by Merger Now Gamble-Skogmo, Inc. v. Borg-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
  4. S. F. Bowser & Co. v. Gilbert & Barker Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1940
  5. Central Manufacturing Co. v. B-M-K Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API