Legal Opinion

State of Maryland Central Collection Unit v. Gettes

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 23, 1991No. 27PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

This District Court collection case is an offshoot of a Health Care Malpractice Claims Act case. At issue is liability for arbitration costs. The panel assessed part of the arbitration costs against, and the State of Maryland now seeks to collect those costs from, the party who prevailed on the merits in arbitration, who later prevailed on the merits in the adversary’s action to nullify, but who did not seek any form of direct judicial review of the panel’s adverse award of partial costs. As we explain below, the State may recover the costs in this action.

*674The respondent,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Salisbury Beauty Schools v. State Board of CosmetologistsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Reyes v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Kentucky River Mills v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  5. Board of Education v. Prince George's County Educators' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Corbett v. GriffinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Curry v. Hillcrest Clinic, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. Crawford v. LeahyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. State, Central Collection v. Dld Associates Ltd. P'shipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. Mikelson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API