Legal Opinion
Kentucky River Mills v. Jackson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 17, 1953No. 11740PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McAllister, circuit judge.
The issues in this case are: (1) whether an 'arbitration award was valid; (2) whether it could be enforced in the action commenced in the district court; and (3) whether an assignee for the purpose of suit could maintain an action on the assigned award.
The controversy arises out of the following circumstances: The Kentucky River Mills, appellant herein, is engaged in the operation of a spinning mill in Frankfort, Kentucky, spinuing only such soft fibers as hemp and jute. In the latter part of 19-13, after completing a large contract for the Navy, 'appellant sought to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Titus v. WallickSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters of America v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Finsilver, Still & Moss, Inc. v. Goldberg, Maas & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Rosenblum v. DingfelderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Robert Lawrence Company, Inc. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Harold F. Ritchie, Inc. v. Chesebrough-Pond's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Frank Derwin v. General Dynamics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Photopaint Technologies, LLC v. Smartlens Corporation and Steven HylenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.