Legal Opinion
Lord v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 1946No. S. F. 17150PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
By this original proceeding in prohibition, Harry A. Lord is endeavoring to prevent any present disposition of the fund which is the basis of the controversy in Lord v. Garland, ante, page 840 [168 P.2d 5].
Lord sued the director and registrar of the Motor Vehicle Department to avoid the payment of fees required by the Caravan Act (Stats. 1937, p. 2253; Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1937, Act 5136) upon the ground that the statute is unconstitutional (Lord v. Ingels, 64 Cal.App.2d 599 [149 P.2d 72]). In connection with his suit he obtained a preliminary injunction, and furnished the required…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Fortenbury v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Redlands High School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Day v. SharpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Stearns v. Los Angeles City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Rio Del Mar Country Club, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.