Legal Opinion

Wright v. State Ex Rel. Walcott

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 30, 1924No. 14774PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinión by

PINKHAM, C.

The defendant in error, as plaintiff, instituted this action in the trial court against plaintiffs in error, as defendants. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the lower court.

Plaintiff alleges in its petition that on November 24, 1919, the Wilson Motor Co., of Okmulgee, Okla., a partnership comp< sed of J. M. Wilson and T. A.Wilson, being then and there the owners of the exclusive agency of the G. M. C. truck for Okmulgee county, and also the owners of certain chattels and a certain lease described in plaintiff’s petition, entered into a contract in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. C. E. Sharp Lumber Co. v. Kansas Ice Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. First National Bank v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
  3. Southern Surety Co. v. ChambersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Eckel v. AdairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Little v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Pansy Oil Co. v. Federal Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Fawcett v. RhyneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  5. Clifford v. United States F. & G. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API