Legal Opinion
First National Bank v. Jones
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 7, 1894PublishedCited by 14 opinions
M)-ror from the District Court of Kingfisher County. Action on promissory note and foreclosure of mortgage. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Scott, J.:
On the 21st day of October, 1892, the First National bank of Arkansas City, Kansas, filed its complaint in the district court of Kingfisher county against James Jones and Nancy A. Jones, containing allegations as follows:
“That on the 25th day of June, 1891, by their prom-isory note, a copy of which is filed herewith and made a part of this complaint, promised to pay to A. V. Alexander the sum of $944.04, six months thereafter, with interest from date, at the rate of ten per cent, per annum, payable at the First National bank of Arkansas City,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bayless v. GlennIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- King v. Enterprise InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Pennsylvania Co. v. HoldermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Westfall v. StarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Price v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Home Insurance Co. of N.Y. v. WhitchurchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Forry v. BrophySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Mason v. SloneckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Raymer v. Comley Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Crockett v. RootSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.