Legal Opinion

Stoddard v. Donahoe

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 6, 2010No. 1 CA-SA 09-0300PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PORTLEY, Judge.

¶ 1 We are asked to decide whether Respondent Superior Court Judge Gary E. Do-nahoe erred when he found Maricopa County Detention Officer Adam Stoddard (“Stod-dard”) in indirect civil contempt and ordered him to publicly apologize to defense counsel, Ms. Joanne Cuccia (“Cuecia”), at a news conference or be jailed until he apologized. Based on the following, we accept special action jurisdiction, affirm the finding of indirect civil contempt, but grant relief in part by vacating the sanction and remanding the matter to the superior court for further proceedings.

FACTUAL…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Frank J. HUBBARD, Appellee, v. FLEET MORTGAGE CO., F/K/A Mortgage Assoc., Inc., AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  4. State v. YslasArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. In Re Grand Jury Witness. United States of America v. Grand Jury WitnessCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Roberts v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. Marriage of Henderson v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  3. BMO Harris Bank National Ass'n v. BluffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. Chambers v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  5. Lillqvist v. Hon. fish/brighamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API