Marriage of Henderson v. Henderson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ESPINOSA, Judge:
¶ 1 Scott Henderson challenges the trial court’s judgment and various rulings related to the registration and enforcement of a foreign support order. For the reasons that follow, we accept special action jurisdiction in part but deny relief, and affirm the trial court’s determinations in full.
Factual and Procedural Background
¶2 We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the trial court’s rulings. Bell-Kilbourn v. Bell-Kilbourn, 216 Ariz. 521, n.1, 169 P.3d 111, 112 n.1 (App. 2007). In 1999, Scott and Suzanne Henderson initiated marriage dissolution…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Castillo v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- FLYING DIAMOND AIRPACK, LLC v. MeienbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Lopez v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Department of Economic Security v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Ahwatukee Custom Estates Management Ass'n v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fuess v. FuessCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
- Green v. RhoadsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- Horst v. HorstCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- Nibley v. HilleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
- Shea G. v. DcsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.