BMO Harris Bank National Ass'n v. Bluff
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TIMMER, Judge.
¶ 1 BMO Harris Bank National Association (“BMO”) files this special action asserting the trial court abused its discretion by holding BMO in civil contempt of a stay order entered pending an appeal. We are asked to decide whether a court can find a party in contempt of a court order for expressing its intention to violate that order in the future. For the reasons that follow, we accept jurisdiction and hold the court lacks such authority. We grant relief to BMO by vacating the court’s contempt orders.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Real-party-in-interest Brian Myers initiated this lawsuit…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Federal Trade Commission v. Affordable Media, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- In Re McConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- In Re Contempt of DoughertyMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ViustMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
- Lillqvist v. Hon. fish/brighamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017