Legal Opinion

Lillqvist v. Hon. fish/brigham

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 21, 2017No. 1 CA-SA 17-0270Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE ANN-CATRINE LILLQVIST, Petitioner, v. THE HONORABLE GEOFFREY FISH, Judge of the SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, in and for the County of MARICOPA, Respondent Judge, ALEXANDER F. BRIGHAM, Real Party in Interest. No. 1 CA-SA 17-0270 FILED 12-21-2017 Petition for Special Action from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. FC 2013-006119 The Honorable Geoffrey H. Fish, Judge…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Van Dyke v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Ong Hing v. ThurstonArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Imperial Litho/Graphics v. M.J. EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  4. Korman v. StrickArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Stoddard v. DonahoeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API