Legal Opinion
Norco Construction, Inc. v. King County
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 3, 1982No. 48040-1PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
Norco Construction, Inc., filed a preliminary plat application for subdivision which conformed to the then existing King County Comprehensive Plan and all applicable laws and policies in effect in the County. It conflicted only with a proposed comprehensive plan. Action on the plat was postponed indefinitely by the County and after the passage of a substantial time during which no definitive action was taken by the County, Norco filed a writ of mandamus to compel the County to act. The trial court granted the writ and directed the County to consider the application on its next agenda on the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Mathews v. CintronSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Girsh AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Smith v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Hillis v. State, Dept. of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Orion Corporation v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Norco Construction, Inc., a Washington Corporation v. King County, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- West Main Associates v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1986
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.