Mentone Irrigation Co. v. Redlands Elec. Light & Power Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The plaintiff, claiming as an appropriator of water from a stream known as Mill Creek, sues to enjoin alleged injurious diversions from the stream. Judgment was given in the court below in favor of the defendants. The appeal is from an order denying the motion of plaintiff for a new trial. The trial took place in March or April, 1904. For some reason, not explained in the record, the findings were not filed until June, 1906, and the bill of exceptions was not settled until June 14, 1907.
It is not claimed that the findings do not cover all the material issues. There are no specifications of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bathgate v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Swift v. Occidental Mining & Petroleum Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Gould v. EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Kaiser v. DaltoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Roberts v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Herminghaus v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Fall River Valley Irrigation District v. Mt. Shasta Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Stratton v. Mount Hermon Boys' SchoolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Seneca Consol. Gold Mines Co. v. Great Western Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.