Legal Opinion

Gesmonde, Pietrosimone, Sgrignari, Pinkus & Sachs v. City of Waterbury

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 10, 1995No. 14996PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.

The principal issue in this appeal is whether a municipal civil service commission has the implied authority to retain independent outside counsel when an obvious conflict of interest disqualifies the municipality’s corporation counsel from representing the commission. The present case involves a claim for attorney’s fees allegedly owed to the plaintiff law firm, Gesmonde, Pietrosimone, Sgrignari, Pinkus and Sachs, by the defendant city of Waterbury (city). The fees were incurred when the Waterbury civil service commission (commission) retained Attorney John Gesmonde to represent it in a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. State v. HammondSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Cahn v. Town of HuntingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Pepe v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Coventry School Committee v. RichtarikSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United Illuminating Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Salt Lake County Commission v. Salt Lake County AttorneyUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Demarest v. Fire DepartmentConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  4. South Portland Civil Service Commission v. City of South PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  5. Berchem, Moses & Devlin, P.C. v. Town of East HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API