Legal Opinion

South Portland Civil Service Commission v. City of South Portland

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 21, 1995PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANA, Justice.

The South Portland Civil Service Commission and its law firm, Desmond & Cooper, P.A, appeal from an adverse judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Brodrick, J.) on their motion for a summary judgment on their claim that the Commission was expressly or impliedly authorized to retain legal counsel at the City’s expense without the City Council’s approval. We affirm the judgment.

The record reveals the following undisputed facts. The South Portland City Council appointed an ad hoc Civil Service Review Committee to draft new civil service rules and regulations.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Busic v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Jordan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  4. Pepe v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Gwinnett County v. YatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Blue Yonder, LLC v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  2. Adoption of M.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  3. Butler v. KilloranSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  4. State v. DaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  5. State v. NastvogelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API