Demarest v. Fire Department
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiffs, James Demarest and John Bolton, appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendants in this quo warranto action challenging the defendants’1 hiring of certain firefighters. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court improperly (1) failed to impanel a jury to act as fact finder in violation of their constitutional right to a jury trial, (2) determined that the Norwalk fire board did not act ar bitrarily and capriciously in applying the criteria for firefighter eligibility, (3) determined that the date on which the firefighters…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Gaudio v. GaudioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Town of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sullivan v. ThorndikeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Kosiorek v. SmigelskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Wiltzius v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- New Haven Firefighters Local 825 v. City of New HavenDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Yellow Cab Co. of New London & Groton, Inc. v. Department of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.