Legal Opinion

Stokes v. Detrick

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 29, 1892PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeals from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

There are two appeals in this record, but they both involve the same questions, and will therefore be considered together.

It appears by the agreed statement of facts that the Waring Manufacturing Company of Cecil County,, made a deed of assignment for the benefit of its creditors on the twenty-third of''May, 1890; Hanson H. Haines and Erancis Stokes having been named therein as trustees. Upon the petition of these trustees, the Circuit Court of Baltimore City duly assumed jurisdiction over the administration of the trust by its order of June 6, 1890. The trustees proceeded to administer their…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fort Worth Publishing Co. v. Hitson & ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Sheldon Hat Blocking Co. v. Eickemeyer Hat Blocking MacHine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. George v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  4. Leppoc v. National Union BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
  5. Young v. OmohundroCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hill v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Edelhoff & Rinke v. Horner-Miller Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  3. Wannamaker v. Edisto Nat. Bank of OrangeburgCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  4. Holloway v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  5. American National Bank v. MacKeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API