Wannamaker v. Edisto Nat. Bank of Orangeburg
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SOPER, Circuit Judge.
The appeal in this ease is taken from a decree of the District Court whereby the bill of complaint was dismissed on motion of the defendants because the facts set out in the bill do not entitle the plaintiff to the relief sought. The suit was brought in equity by certain stockholders of the Orangeburg National Bank of Orangeburg, S. C., on behalf of themselves and all other stockholders who might care to come in, against the receiver of the bank appointed by the Comptroller of the Currency, and against the Edisto National Bank of Orangeburg, S. C., to enjoin a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Southern Development Co. v. SilvaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Bushnell v. LelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Wyman v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Zabriskie v. Cleveland, Columbus, & Cincinnati RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Fogg v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re the Liquidation of Franklin National BankDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1974
- Meeker v. BaxterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- United States Sav. Bank v. MorgenthauCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Central Republic Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1936
- In Re the Liquidation of American City Bank & Trust Co., N.A.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.