Edelhoff & Rinke v. Horner-Miller Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas (Harlan, C. J.) At the trial the following prayers, among others, were offered: Plaintiff’s 1st Prayer.—If the jury find from the evidence that the Horner-Miller Straw Goods Manufacturing Company of Baltimore City, a body corporate, purchased from the plaintiffs the goods described in the declaration; and that at the time of said purchase said body corporate knew itself to be insolvent and had no reasonable expectation of…
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas (Harlan, C. J.) At the trial the following prayers, among others, were offered: Plaintiff’s 1st Prayer.—If the jury find from the evidence that the Horner-Miller Straw Goods Manufacturing Company of Baltimore City, a body corporate, purchased from the plaintiffs the goods described in the declaration; and that at the time of said purchase said body corporate knew itself to be insolvent and had no reasonable expectation of paying for the same, and did not pay for the same; that said body corporate, on the 17th day of September, 1895, made a…
1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.
The appellees have moved to dismiss this appeal, upon the ground that the bill of exception was not signed by the Judge, within the time allowed by the statute, and this motion will be first considered'.
The verdict was rendered on the 20th of April, 1897. On the 7th of May the parties agreed that the time for signing and sealing the exception should be extended for the period of thirty days from that date, and on the 17th of May the Court so ordered. On the 28th of May the parties again agreed there should be a further extension until the 15th of June, and on the 29th May the Court passed an…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Etheridge v. SperrySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Ex Parte Martha Bradstreet in the Matter of James Jackson Ex Dem. Martha Bradstreet v. Daniel ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Thomas v. FordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
- Russell v. . WinneNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Winston v. GordonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
- Hoffman v. Key Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- United Railways & Electric Co. v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
- Williams v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
- Carter v. Maryland & Pennsylvania RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.