Legal Opinion

Royal Oak Enterprises, LLC v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 28, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2013-1040Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Gladys Kessler, United States District Judge

Royal Oak, LLC (“Royal Oak,” “Plaintiff’ or “the Company”) brings this action to challenge an Order by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC,” “Defendant,” or “the Agency”). 1 On October 31, 2008, Royal Oak terminated the pension plan (“the Plan”) it had previously operated for the benefit of its employees under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. After the Plan’s termination date, Royal Oak changed the method it used to calculate certain payments to Plan participants.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.