Legal Opinion

McRo, Inc. v. Namco Bandai Games America, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided July 11, 2013No. CV 12-10322-GW(FFMx)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEFENDANT NAUGHTY DOG, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (filed 06/10/13; Dkt. No. 105)

GEORGE H. WU, District Judge.

Court hears oral argument. The Tentative circulated and attached hereto, is adopted as the Court’s final ruling. Defendants’ motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant Naughty Dog, Inc.’s response to the amended complaint will be due 21 days from the date of this order.

McRO, Inc., d.b.a. Planet Blue v. Naushtv Dog. Inc., Case No. CV-12-10335-GW (FFMx) consolidated with McRO, Inc., d.b.a. Planet Blue v. Namco Bandai Games America, Inc., CV…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Mendiondo v. Centinela Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. Silergy Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  2. ACQIS LLC v. Quanta Computer, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2023
  3. Fate Therapeutics, Inc. v. Shoreline Biosciences, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023
  4. Ocean Semiconductors LLC v. Analog Devices, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
  5. State of Washington v. O'Reilly Auto Enterprises LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API