Legal Opinion
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. Silergy Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 18, 2015No. Case No. 14-cv-01745-VCPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS, AND DENYING MOTION TO STAY
VINCE CHHABRIA, United States District Judge
Breach of Contract
Silergy and Chen’s motion to dismiss MPS’s breach of contract claim is denied.
The breach of contract claim is based on the “Nondisclosure” provision of a settlement agreement reached by the parties to resolve prior litigation. The nondisclosure provision states as follows: “Dr. Chen represents and warrants not to use or disclose any document that contains MPS confidential information, including all documents that Dr. Chen received or sent while…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International InterlinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- I4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Consul Limited, Kenneth B. Wilson Dba Ken Wilson Associates v. Solide Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation, and Hrh Operating Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Westlands Water Dist. v. US Dept. of InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- AllRounds, Inc. v. eShares, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
- NantWorks, LLC v. Niantic, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Sonos, Inc. v. Google LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022