Legal Opinion

Fate Therapeutics, Inc. v. Shoreline Biosciences, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided February 13, 2023No. 3:22-cv-00676Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FATE THERAPEUTICS, INC.; and Case No.: 22-cv-00676-H-MSB WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR 12 BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, ORDER REQUIRING 13 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON Plaintiffs, DEFENDANT SHORELINE’S 14 v. MOTION FOR PARTIAL 15 SUMMARY JUDGMENT SHORELINE BIOSCIENCES, INC.; and 16 DAN S. KAUFMAN, 17 Defendants. 18 On January 27, 2023, Defendant Shoreline Biosciences, Inc. (“Shoreline”) filed a 19 motion for partial summary judgment. (Doc. No. 127.) In the motion, Shoreline argues 20 that it is entitled to summary judgment on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Monsanto Co. v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  2. Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  3. American Federation State, County & Municipal Employees v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  4. Hughes Aircraft Co. v. National Semiconductor Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1994
  5. McRo, Inc. v. Namco Bandai Games America, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API