Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1917No. 335PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Probate of will. Before Judge Bell. Fulton superior' court. April 7, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

1. A will was offered for probate in solemn form. A caveat was filed. A demurrer to the caveat was sustained. Direct exception to the order sustaining the demurrer was brought to this court, this being the only assignment of error. A motion is made to dismiss the bill of exceptions as being prematurely brought. Eeld, that the case is still pending in the court below, and on motion the writ of error is dismissed, it not falling within one of the exceptions provided by statute. Civil Code (1910), § 6138. See Johnson v. Merchants &c. Bank, 141 Ga. 721 (81 S. E. 873) ; Burkhalter v. Roach, 145…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burkhalter v. RoachSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Harvey v. BowlesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Johnson v. Merchants & Farmers BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Douglas v. HardinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. Drake v. DrakeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  3. Shropshire v. BroomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  4. Whiddon v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  5. Ragan v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API