Legal Opinion

Douglas v. Hardin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1927No. 5422PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

There is a motion to dismiss the writ of error, because there has been no final judgment. The motion must be sustained, because, until there has been a final judgment in the lower court, this court is without jurisdiction to deal with the subject-matter. Irrespective of the pendency of any previous litigation, and without reference to the question of costs, the rule is inflexible that only exceptions pendente lite can be filed unless there has been a final judgment disposing of the case adversely to the party who seeks a writ of error, or a refusal of the court to render a judgment in his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lyndon v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Ross v. MercerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. City of Tallapoosa v. BrockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  4. Baldwin v. LoweSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  5. Burkhalter v. RoachSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Peerless Laundry Co. v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Firemen's Insurance v. BlountCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Cone v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  4. Mims v. GoetteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  5. COMMERCIAL NATIONAL BANK OF CEDARTOWN v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API