Legal Opinion

Shropshire v. Broome

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 11, 1950No. 17189PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hawkins, Justice.

A caveat was filed to a proceeding to probate a will in solemn form, to which caveat the propounder interposed general and special demurrers. The case having been appealed from the court of ordinary to the superior court, the trial judge in the superior court entered an order and judgment overruling the demurrer to the caveat, and to this judgment only the propounder excepts by direct bill of exceptions, there being no assignment of error upon any judgment granting or refusing probate of the will. Held:

1. Although no motion has been made to dismiss the writ of error, “where…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Malsby v. ShippSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  2. Etheridge v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Horton v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  4. Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  5. Simpson v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McConnell v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  2. Driver v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  3. Broome v. ShropshireSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API