Legal Opinion

Whiddon v. Hill

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 17, 1935No. 10293PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

A will was offered for probate in solemn form, a caveat was filed, and a motion to strike the caveat was sustained. The bill of exceptions contains no assignment of error upon any judgment granting or refusing probate of the will, but the sustaining of the motion to strike the caveat is the only error assigned. Held, that the judgment complained of is not a final judgment and would not have been final “if it had been rendered as claimed by plaintiff in error.” Code of 1910, § 6138. This court is therefore without jurisdiction to entertain the bill of exceptions; and the writ of error must be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Malsby v. ShippSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  2. Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  3. Ragan v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Price v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  2. Shropshire v. BroomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  3. Driver v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API