Legal Opinion
Perkins v. Fasig
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 28, 2000No. AC 18612PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUPONT, J.
The primary issue of this appeal is whether the defendants Terri-Ann Fasig McLaughlin and Cheryl Mollica have implied easements over a portion of a roadway owned by the plaintiff. The plaintiff, Grace W. Perkins, brought this action to quiet title and to enjoin permanently all of the defendants from passing over a portion of the plaintiffs land known as Spinning Wheel Lane in New Fairfield.1 The plaintiff also claimed *73adverse possession of another portion of Spinning Wheel Lane owned by the defendant Arthur Fasig. The trial court rendered judgment (1) granting the plaintiff…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jacque v. Steenberg Homes, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Marone v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Abington Ltd. Partnership v. HeubleinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Carbone v. VigliottiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Whitton v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. SnelgroveSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Sanders v. DiasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Town of Southington v. Commercial Union InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Fortin v. Hartford Underwriters InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Gemmell v. LeeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.