Beswick v. Churchill Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The appeal is from the judgment following an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. The action was brought by a judgment creditor of the grantors to set aside, on the ground that they were made to defraud creditors, certain deeds that were executed on June 29, 1900. It appears by the complaint that said grantors, Presley A. Dorris and Carlos J. Dorris, have died and administrators of their estates have been appointed and administration thereof is still pending, and plaintiff, therefore, prayed that said deeds of conveyance be set aside "as fraudulent and null and void . . . and that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Putney v. FletcherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Herrlich v. KaufmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Ohm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Mesmer v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Hills v. SherwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rummens v. Guaranty Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1939
- Webb v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943