Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert James Andrino

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 10, 1974No. 72-1890, 72-1891PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCAS, District Judge:

These appeals are from Andrino’s respective criminal convictions on three counts of violating the extortionate credit transactions statute, 18 U.S.C. § 891 et seq. (Title II of the Consumer Credit Protection Act, 82 Stat. 159.) Andrino was indicted twice, on two counts each, for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 894, collection of extensions of credit by extortionate means. The cases were consolidated for trial. The jury returned guilty verdicts as to both counts of the first indictment, and a guilty verdict as to the second count of the second indictment.

The cases concern three…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Perez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. Roy Arthur NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. RoselliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  4. Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. Germaine Haili, United States of America v. Earl K. H. KimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. State v. NicelyOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. United States v. Frank Stearns GieseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. SarkisianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Michael S. Polizzi, United States of America v. Joseph E. MatrangaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Daniel L. BalzanoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API