Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael S. Polizzi, United States of America v. Joseph E. Matranga
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 10, 1986No. 85-5170, 85-5171PublishedCited by 149 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
Michael S. Polizzi (“Polizzi”) and Joseph E. Matranga (“Matranga”) appeal their convictions for conspiracy to collect and the collection of extensions of credit by extortionate means under 18 U.S.C. § 894 (1982) and travel in aid of racketeering under 18 U.S.C. § 1952 (1982). 1
Polizzi and Matranga jointly raise contentions concerning the jury instructions and a contention that a key government witness committed perjury. They also raise separate issues regarding the jury instructions, a quashed subpoena, Jencks Act and Brady material, a severance, sufficiency of the…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by149 opinions
- United States v. David Dominic NecoecheaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Stacey C. Koon, Cross-Appellee. United States of America v. Laurence M. Powell, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Arnold Sherlock and Ronald CharleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Javier Hincapie Sanchez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Richard AicheleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.