Legal Opinion

State v. Nicely

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1988No. Nos. 87-672 and 87-701PublishedCited by 324 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

In this case, we are presented with the issue of whether a conviction for murder may be supported wholly by circumstantial evidence. For the following reasons, we hold that a murder conviction may be supported by such evidence and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and reinstate the trial court’s judgment.

Circumstantial evidence is defined as “[testimony not based on actual personal knowledge or observation of the facts in controversy, but of other facts from which deductions are drawn, showing indirectly the facts sought to be proved. * * *” Black’s Law Dictionary (5…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. State v. EdwardsOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. HankersonOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. People v. CullenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. State v. KuligOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Epperly v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by324 opinions

  1. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. LottOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. FranklinOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. TylerOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. GrantOhio Supreme Court · 1993

319 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API