In Re Initiative Petition No. 360
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Vice Chief Justice.
This is an original action brought pursuant to 34 O.S.Supp.1992, § 8 challenging the legal sufficiency of Initiative Petition 360, State Question 662 (Petition), and an appeal pursuant to 34 O.S.1991, § 10 from the ballot title prepared by the Oklahoma Attorney General. The Petition seeks to amend via the initiative process1 Article 2 of the Oklahoma Constitu*812tion by adding a new section to be designated section 12A.
In starting our analysis in this matter we emphasize we do not decide the wisdom of the proposed constitutional amendment because that question will be…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Plugge Ex Rel. Arkansas for Representative Democracy v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Kerby v. LuhrsArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 349, State Question No. 642Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 397, STATE QUESTION NO. 767Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 382Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 363, State Question No. 672Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 384, State Question No. 731Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Comer v. Preferred Risk Mutual Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.