Legal Opinion

Cameron Lanning Cormack v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 4, 2014No. 13-232CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Patent case; claim construction for U.S. Patent No. 7,781,693

OPINION AND ORDER

LETTOW, Judge.

In this patent case, plaintiff, Mr. Cameron Lanning Cormaek, alleges'that the United' States, through the United States Postal Service (“Postal Service”), has infringed claims 1-5, 9-13, and 19 of U.S. Patent No. 7,781,-693 (“the '693 patent”), entitled “Method and System for Sorting Incoming Mail,” and is therefore liable for damages under 28 U.S.C. § 1498(a), Compl. at 2; Pl.’s Opening Claim Construction Br. (“Pl.’s Br.”) at i., ECF No. 66. 1 This opinion addresses claim construction for 'terms of…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  5. Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cameron Lanning Cormack v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API