Legal Opinion

State v. Christie

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1988No. 12438PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

NAKAMURA, J.

We granted certiorari to review the approval by the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA) of the Honolulu Police Department’s use of a “Beam Attenuator” in verifying the accuracy of a breath-testing device, an Intoxilyzer 4011 AS, employed to measure the concentration of alcohol in the blood of putative drunken drivers. A thorough review of the record and the relevant statutes and administrative rules disclosing no error, we affirm the ICA’s ruling.

I

Steven Richard Christie was charged with Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicating Liquor in violation of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Camara v. AgsaludHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Mahiai v. SuwaHawaii Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. DavisHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. TenganHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. ChristieHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. NesmithHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. MezurashiHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. YoungHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. State v. KirnHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. WetzelHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API