Legal Opinion

State v. Tengan

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1984No. 9151, 9311PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

NAKAMURA, J.

A State agency must follow the Administrative Procedure Act, Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) Chapter 91, when it acts in a rule-making capacity. Town v. Land Use Commission, 55 Haw. 538, 545, 524 P.2d 84, 89, reh. denied, 55 Haw. 677 (1974). In these appeals, Defendants Wayne Taro Tengan and Glenn Ichiro Akita challenge the use of the Intoxilyzer 401 IAS (the Intoxilyzer), a breath-testing device, to measure the concentration of alcohol in the blood of suspected drunken drivers on the ground that its use has not been authorized pursuant to a rule adopted in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pacific Insurance Co., Ltd. v. Oregon Auto. Ins. Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. KaneakuaHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Town v. Land Use CommissionHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. RaitzHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  5. People v. UrbanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. SouzaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. State v. FerrerHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. State v. ChristieHawaii Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. YoungHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. State v. KirnHawaii Supreme Court · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API